tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18653650.post3373378514840198851..comments2024-03-28T22:51:39.946-04:00Comments on Waterbury Thoughts: DetailsRaechel Guesthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00877208684670929373noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18653650.post-78241390405471899732010-12-01T20:04:10.497-05:002010-12-01T20:04:10.497-05:00Thanks Howard. I have now deleted everything that ...Thanks Howard. I have now deleted everything that was not essential to my points. I understand and respect your copyright issues, but it does leave me a little uncomfortable, as readers might wonder if I deleted anything that would undermine my arguments. <br /><br />I would normally just add a link to the article, without copying all the text, but since the article wasn't posted as a Raechel Guesthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00877208684670929373noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18653650.post-75750405153013692052010-12-01T19:31:03.124-05:002010-12-01T19:31:03.124-05:00Hi, Waterbury Girl. I've asked the reporter an...Hi, Waterbury Girl. I've asked the reporter and city editor to check into a correction and possibly to follow up on this. Thanks for calling it to our attention.<br /><br />Please be aware, though, that lifting an entire story from the paper is a violation of copyright, and we ask that you don't do this. A link to the story (yes, we realize that only part of the story is visible to Howard Fieldinghttp://www.rep-am.comnoreply@blogger.com